Wednesday, November 18

Stimulating Waste in Dunn County

About nine months ago the federal government decided to spend on an average $7,000 of your families taxes in an attempt to create jobs and boost the economy with a $787 billion spending spree. As the results slowly trickle in the question is how has an area like Dunn County done?

Not surprisingly, the government has done a fine job finding ways to spend your tax dollars. According to information the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has complied, $17.17 million has been spent in Dunn County alone. We all know that spending is not as important as the jobs though. How did the jobs fair in the county?

Badly. Unfortunately that $17.17 million dollars has only created 16.52 jobs in the County according to the government’s own figures. Do the math and you find that it takes over $1 million taxpayer dollars to create or save one single job in the County! Worse, although President Obama promised that 90% of the jobs would be saved or created in the private sector all but 3 of those 16.52 jobs were government agencies reporting jobs saved or created.

To add even more confusion the only primary recipient that was a private business and not a government identity was 4 Control Inc which reported receiving $0 and yet was reported as creating three private sector jobs. Lee Shambeau helps run 4 Control Inc. He confirmed that his company had not been paid for any stimulus dollars yet, although they had worked on one stimulus project with three employees for two days. The reporting requirements were incredibly confusing he acknowledged and the report on that one project is what probably showed up on the site. Most of the stimulus funding he is hoping to receiving is still only a hope with no confirmation. So while the government drags its feet and hints at possible funding it happily reports the jobs it has “saved”. In reality then, Dunn County only created or saved 13.52 jobs at a cost of $1.2 million per job.

These local results should be no surprise given that the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported “A stimulus job report that says more than 10,000 jobs were saved or created in Wisconsin is rife with errors, double counting and inflated numbers based more on satisfying federal formulas than creating real jobs.”

Instead of dumping money on government bureaucracies and calling it stimulus, I asked Lee Shambeau from 4 Control what the impact of 1 million dollars in tax cuts would have had to a business like his. Would he have been able to create one job with 1 million dollars? He quickly replied “Taxes are killing business. Taxes are very instrumental part of the cost of doing business.”

As national unemployment jumps to 10.2% and Dunn County unemployment hits 7.6% we would do well to reconsider our attempt to put your family $7,000 in federal debt to spend over $1.2 million per bureaucratic job saved. We would do much better to increase the competitiveness of small businesses like 4 Control through tax cuts if we want to see real employment in Dunn County and across our great country.


Monday, November 16

The Congressional Healthcare Confusion

Note: This article ran as an opinion piece in the Dunn County News.

Confused about the healthcare bill? You’re not alone to be sure. Just take a look at some of our local Midwestern representative’s statements and let your head spin. I’m not even talking of the partisan debate. Take three rural Democratic Congressmen: Collin Peterson (D-MN), Jim Oberstar (D-MN), and our own Ron Kind (D-WI). Collin Peterson voted against the bill because "We've got over a $70 trillion unfunded liability in this over the next 75 years and we're just going to make it worse. And I don't see how that's sustainable.” Kind said, “The CBO (Congressional Budget Office) has confirmed that the House health care reform bill reduces the national deficit by $109 billion over the next 10 years with estimated subsequent savings through 2029.” (Personal email with Kind).

Federal funding for abortion is even more confusing. All three said they supported keeping federal funds from going toward abortion. Yet Ron Kind said that the healthcare legislation would not use public dollars to fund abortion; Peterson and Oberstar said it would. Let the debate begin!Publish Post

The original bill (H.R. 3200) on page 110 said, “[N]othing in this Act shall be construed as preventing the public health insurance option from providing for” payments for all elective abortions. Indeed, factcheck.org a nonpartisan watchdog group confirmed that the bill would allow for public funding of abortion. Kind might say that only premiums paid for the public option will go for abortions, but that is like letting AIG employees earmark their Medicare payment for spa treatments and claim there is no public funding. Logically and legally the government can only spend public dollars. Strike one for Kind.

As has been widely reported, there was also an amendment by Bart Stupak (D-MI) that the Catholic Bishops supported to specifically and narrowly keep public funding for abortion out of healthcare reform. Regardless of what they thought the bill originally said, you would hope they could all support clarifying no public funds for abortion. Nope. Of the three, Kind was the only one that voted against it. Strike two for Kind.

According to a recent Gallup poll Congressional approval is at historic lows along with the trust in government. There is little wonder why. When Congressman from the same party in neighbouring states cannot agree or accurately explain a bill to their constituents back home, we should lose faith in them to properly serve us. And that is a strikeout for everyone.

Tuesday, September 29

Will Scott Walker be our Mitch Daniels?

I still wish this guy would run for president. On policy he would totally destroy Obama. He has the fiscal credentials to energize all Republicans. Mitch Daniels for president! 

On a Wisconsin note, I think that Scott Walker has established himself as a fiscal leader with the experience to bring some fiscal sanity to the state. My hope would be that he could do some of the same things that Daniels has done in Indiana.

Thursday, August 27

Obama "asks" the NEA to support his Agenda

Money for art that supports his cause. hmmmm.

Discussed throughout the conference call was a hope that this group would be one that would carry on past the United We Serve campaign to support the President’s initiatives and those issues for which the group was passionate. The making of a machine appeared to be in its infancy, initiated by the NEA, to corral artists to address specific issues. This function was not the original intention for creating the National Endowment for the Arts. 

A machine that the NEA helped to create could potentially be wielded by the state to push policy. Through providing guidelines to the art community on what topics to discuss and providing them a step-by-step instruction to apply their art form to these issues, the “nation’s largest annual funder of the arts” is attempting to direct imagery, songs, films, and literature that could create the illusion of a national consensus. This is what Noam Chomsky calls “manufacturing consent.”

RIP: Mary Jo Kopechne--the world remembers

Mary Jo Kopechne passed away on July 18, 1969 when Ted Kennedy under the influence of alcohol flew off the highway and left her drowned in the car. Kennedy so disgraced lived on as a hero in the eyes of liberals in spite of himself.

Tuesday, August 25

More Facts on Abortion-ObamaCare Link

MYTH: The so-called “Hyde Amendment” restricts federal funds from paying for abortions through Medicaid and applies in the healthcare bill.

FACT: Actually the health care overhaul bypasses the Hyde amendment. But even if it didn’t, we cannot be fooled by this pro-abortion “two-step.” If the Hyde amendment did apply it would still be subject to annual re-approval. It is clear that the goal is to confuse the public about the abortion mandate using claims like this one and then come back next year and remove the Hyde amendment.

If Representatives and Senators oppose taxpayer funding for abortion or plans that cover abortion, it only follows that such an explicit provision must be contained in the largest health care overhaul in the history of our nation

Factcheck.org Agrees with National Right to Life

Obama and our Congressman keep saying that the government health insurance plan being offered by Congress will not use tax dollars to pay for abortion. The truth? Factcheck.org agrees with NRLC:

Abortion foes quickly denounced Obama’s statement
as untrue. The NRLC’s Johnson said "the bill backed by the White House
(H.R. 3200) explicitly authorizes the government plan to cover all
elective abortions." And our analysis shows that Johnson’s statement is
correct. Though we of course take no position on whether the
legislation should allow or not allow coverage for abortions, the House
bill does just that.
Video update on how Kind continues the fabrication coming soon.

Monday, August 24

Accountable Congress and "w"Ron"g" Kind Townhall Event

Accountable Congress captured Ron Kind and his abdication of liberty here at this Townhall event. So if Kind votes for the public option will he himself go on the public option? Answer: no, he likes his own health care his wife gets for him. Will he enact tort reform? He didn't answer. Will he make sure that abortion is not included? sidestepped the question.

Wednesday, August 12

Note: New Locations for Kind's Listening Sessions

Tuesday, August 18th
3:00-4:30pm
*Community Center
600 W Seminary St
Richland Center, WI 53581

Thursday, August 20th

11:00am-12:30pm
*Tomah High School Auditorium
901 Lincoln Ave
Tomah, WI 54660

Friday, August 21st
11:00am-12:30pm
*Whitehall High School Auditorium
19121 Hobson St
Whitehall, WI 54773-8652

Tuesday, August 25th
12:30-2:00pm
*Darlington High School
11838 Center Hill Rd
Darlington, WI 53530-9605

Tuesday, August 25th
6:30-7:30pm

Since I will not be able to visit every county this August, I also plan
to hold a health care telephone town hall.  Interested constituents can
dial-in to the telephone town hall by calling (toll-free)
1-877-229-8493 and entering the code 13433.

AWOL Kohl and Feingold for Townhall

So Kohl does not know when or where he will have a townhall this summer. Want to talk to your Senator about the health care disaster? Tough.

And what about the vaunted Feingold and his townhall listening sessions? Well, he has four in the uppermost part of the state. Almost like he is avoiding the populous areas. Well.

Tuesday, August 4

Kind's Townhall Schedule

Go and let him know how you feel about the Healthcare disaster trying to force its way thru Congress.

Tuesday, August 18th

3:00-4:00pm
County Courthouse
Conference Room 2 - First Floor
181 W Seminary St.
Richland Center, WI 53581-2356
(608) 647-2626

Thursday, August 20th
11:00am-12:30pm
City Hall
Council Chambers
819 Superior Ave.
Tomah, WI 54660
(608) 374-7420

Friday, August 21st
11:00am-12:30pm
Tri-County Memorial Hospital
Education Room
18601 Lincoln St.
Whitehall, WI 54773-8605
(715) 538-4361

Tuesday, August 25th
12:30-2:00pm
Darlington Memorial Hospital
Conference Room
800 Clay St.
Darlington, WI 53530
(608) 776-4466

Congressman Kegan's Constituents Angry over Healthcare Deform

Monday, August 3

Well thought thru Marriage Arguments

Robert George does a good job defining the importance of marriage today in the WSJ.

Monday, July 20

Church works with Homosexual Mayor to Help

Now, you might be thinking this is some liberal mainline church. Nope. Its the conservative churches. In an interesting merging of working with a government that is at odds with many of the basic beliefs of Christians. So here is the important question: Is the church abandoning its first and final mission of sharing the gospel? Not when asked directly. Is the care they give contingent on belief? The answer is again no. It is Season of Service in Portland Oregon.

Thursday, July 16

China Steals Code and More

ZDNet reports that the Chinese government has stolen a computer program called Cybersitter for their Green Dam spy software.

Then the companies' servers crash after they threaten to sue. hmmmmm.

Tuesday, July 14

Small Biz Tax

Roberts Influence

John Roberts has had an important and and yet more hidden wide ranging influence. Just another evidence of his influence are the confirmation hearings. Not only has judge Sotomayor admitted against her earlier statements that Constitution is not a living document but can only be changed by Amendments, but the very analogy of a baseball umpire has become the standard by which the Senators have asked their questions.

Friday, June 26

w Ron g Kind of Vote on Global Warming

Ron Kind made a terrible decision in voting for the Cap and Trade Carbon taxing bill today. Even as more and more scientists and countries begin to question the science of man made global warming, Kind voted to add almost $3,000 to every families yearly cost. What about for Wisconsin specifically? According to the Heritage Foundation studies on the impact of the bill, particularly hard-hit industries are agriculture, transportation, chemicals, wood products, machinery, paper, plastics & rubber, electrical equipment & appliances, construction and of course manufacturing.

Except for the petroleum production, this list IS Wisconsin.

Even as we see the Janesville WI GM plant destroyed by government policies, we can expect this same regulation to entrap much of the rest of the state. 

Monday, June 22

Chrsit the King Lutheran Church near Spring Valley

Are you looking for a church in the Spring Valley area that is Lutheran in doctrine and yet has a sincere


desire to preach the Word of God? Christ the King Lutheran Church in Wilson Wisconsin shares your desire to worship the Lord in all the glory and majesty.

Worship Service Times

9:00am Sunday Worship

10:30 Truth Project 


Sunday, June 21

Climate Change Reconsidered: 25,000 Scientists

An important work has been published by prominent scientists and signed by thousands that questions the whole man made global warming fraud. Don't get caught swallowing the lure before you read Climate Change Reconsidered.

Thursday, June 18

Around the Web: Website Development

I just created a website for my church Christ the King Lutheran. I again used Joomla to create the website--a CMS I continue to be very impressed with. The biggest part of Joomla is the extensions that you can plug into it. Do not like the editor? Find a plug in that does it. Want to add pictures or a special way to edit the HTML? Again there are thousands of extensions many of them which you can use for free.

For website hosting I used Fatcows. Not only do they provide one of the cheapest plans but they also have top of the line customer support. I had used GoDaddy in the past and was satisfied with their price (not as good as FatCows though) but had troubles with their help and site navigation. Fatcows has a better navigation system and less service advertisements. It is simple, clean, and effective.

I have had a few issues with server speed, but they seem to have addressed those. If you do use Fat cows, please enter my website (www.visitchristtheking.org) in as your referral and I will get a slight discount on my next membership renewal.

Wednesday, June 17

Menomonie Strawberries!

You looking for a good taste of strawberries this summer? Red Cedar Valley Farms has the best strawberries in Menomonie. They should be starting tomorrow and will be available soon in Menomonie, Eau Claire, Hudson and Baldwin. You can check out the website here for updates.

Monday, June 15

Serious Cutting of Gov't

It is true that Republicans have lost much of their credibility when it comes to lower spending by being complacent and even advocates for bigger government. In fact, they still aren't getting it. Their report they spend 99% as much as President Obama according to Heritage.

Brian Riedl also offers some other ways that Republicans could and should advance to cut the size of government.

 * Eliminating the $60 billion spent annually on corporate welfare programs.
 * Reducing farm subsidies for large and profitable agribusinesses, which actually worsen the farm economy.
 * Devolving functions like highways, economic development, education, housing, and anti-poverty programs to state and local governments that are closest to the people. This would eliminate the expensive Washington middleman, and tailoring local programs to local needs (while eliminating failed programs) would surely save tax dollars.  Given the unpopularity of Washington, this should be a no-brainer.
 * Most importantly, addressing Social Security and Medicare, which would otherwise require a doubling of all current tax rates. A logical place to start would be a progressive indexing of Social Security benefits for upper-income seniors and also stopping over-subsidizing the Medicare B and D premiums for upper-income seniors.

Should Concepts be Patented?

Monday, June 8

Shelby Steele Hits the Problem with Sotomayor

on the head when it comes to her elevation over race.

Hispanic Conservative on Sotomayor

She thinks her "wise latina" comment shouldn't have been criticized harshly. You know, just accept it that your skin color, determines your ability to judge.

Thursday, June 4

Microsoft responds in positive way to porn criticism

Microsoft's new search engine Bing had come under harsh criticism from family advocates for lack of porn filters. To the credit of the software giant they responded today (one day after launch) by adding the possibility for network administrators and parents to add safety controls to the Bing search.  

Ecuador Gov't v. Chevron Recap


Image by erjkprunczyk via Flickr
Ecuador suffers from one of the worst environmental disasters in the world in an oil spill in the Amazon jungle. You can read the Chevron side here and the Gov't supported side here.

One would really have to be a judge and see all the evidence to make a final and conclusive judgement on the matter, but after reading both sides the fault and blame seems to fall most heavily on the shoulders of the government of Ecuador.

The Ecuador gov't started out with a 25% stake in the operation that rose to 65% and finally to total control in 1992. Texaco/Chevron and others had much of the control of the operations but had to constantly wind their way through the loops of gov't control. When Chevron finally was given the boot out of the country they negotiated an exemption from liability with the government with a clean up of their portion of the problem that cost $40 million. Did they actually clean up what they said they would? The government then said yes, and signed the contract. Outside interest groups now say no, and want to hold Chevron responsible.

I might sound like a broken record soon, but I firmly believe that good government is about following the law, and that includes the government as well. The Ecuadorian government followed few laws.

In 1999 a new law was passed that created a loophole for new Chevron liability in the case. An ex post facto or retroactive law was passed to make it possible for not only the government to hold Chevron responsibile but individuals as well. This violated the Ecuadorian constitution.

Further, the present government of Ecuador has threatened to dismiss any judge that rules in favor of Chevron. Say goodbye to an independent judiciary.

This whole scenario reminds me of John Adam's position in the Boston Massacre. John Adam's at the peril of his career and even safety argued in defense of the soldiers who shot and killed individuals at a Massachusetts protest. Why? Because the law supported them.

Chevron might not be a nice company. Maybe they are. That should not matter. Those responsible should bare the costs, and that appears to be the Ecuadorian government.

Monday, June 1

If we only could tax gov't stupidity not gas companies


Image via Wikipedia
The oil company tax that Doyle has proposed has hit several snags along the way.

The Chicago-Tribune Reports:

[T]he nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau, have questioned whether Wisconsin can legally or practically stop large oil companies like Exxon and British Petroleum from raising prices at the pump to make up for the state tax.

No other state taxes oil companies and bars them from passing the tax along at the pump, the Fiscal Bureau said.

....

"It is likely the oil industry will litigate swiftly in the hope that successful litigation would put an end to any efforts by other states to enact similar provisions," the Fiscal Bureau said in a memo for lawmakers.


The tax is a percentage based on revenues of the oil companies, not their profits as Doyle has repeatedly characterized it. Because fuel may be bought and sold several times before it gets to the pump, tracking the costs of each buyer and seller would be difficult, the Fiscal Bureau said.


So this law is not only wrong because of the higher taxes, but legally it appears fishy as well. And if the companies get lower profits in Wisconsin what is going to keep them from just leaving the state? Or at minimum building fewer gas stations or offering fewer services (like free air) with your gas purchase. There is no free lunch and that goes for the government as much as the consumer.

Really, if you hate Exxon Mobil don't buy gas from them. Taxing them will only make your gas purchasing more expensive one way or another. I for one have a bigger contempt for bad and illogical government laws.

Wednesday, May 27

The Hispanic Conservative and Tuition for the Illegal

Alex Rodriguez provides a thoughtful response to my previous post:

I do not agree with my conservative brethren that the children of immigrants should be punished because their parents elected to flee from a land of oppression. And yes, I use the word “punish” because it most accurately reflects Pillman’s position. Pillman’s argument misses its mark because it assumes that children are guilty of breaking the law vicariously through their parents. Thus, according to Pillman, they are rendered ineligible for receipt of equal educational privileges enjoyed by non-immigrants.


I argued in the comments of the original article that children can be caught by legitimate laws that their parents don't obey. However, in this case, the children are also breaking the law. It is not even as Alex argues that the equivalent is punishing a child if the parent stole a car. The equivalent of Doyle's proposal would be giving a stereo system to the kid after you caught both the kid and the parent stealing and both have continued in theft.

Again, I just can't see how giving tuition is rewarding lawlessness.

Lady Justice: I have a Dream!



"Let us not wallow in the valley of despair, I say to you today, my friends.

And so even though we face the difficulties of everyone saying a justice should be confirmed simply because of her race and sex, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

I have a dream that one day on Capital Hill, the sons of sixties radicals and the sons of former racists will be able to sit down together at a confirmation hearing and be blind to race.

I have a dream that one day even the Supreme Court that tortures the definition of blind equality with affirmative action will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be voted for or appointed by the color of their skin but by their character and qualifications.

I have a dream today!"

Sotomayor: Judges Make Policy

Tuesday, May 26

Chronicle of Irresponsibility

While you were out grilling, the Democratic controlled Finance Committee worked to send more of your money up in smoke: 

Sample:

- $138,000.00 in savings over two years from the Medigap Helpline. Oh wait, the "savings" is lapsed into the general fund for other spending. Not a cut.

-Approved $25,000.00 for a feasibility study. Looks like I spoke too fast. With a $6 billion dollar deficit staring us in the face, do we have the money, even if it is only $25,000, to spend on a study?

Tip to Avoid Swine Flu: Don't do this


Thursday, May 21

Help the legal not illegal

This is in response to "Undocumented Immigrants should recieve state tuition" by Tim Schilke

Laws are made to be followed. People are punished for breaking the laws, not rewarded. Such notions might be common sense and require the barest of understanding of justice and government but don't count on it when it comes to illegal immigration.

Doyle has proposed instate tuition for illegal immigrants but doing so will only hurt immigrants and the state and country they so desire to come to.

Of course I have to say before we actually engage the argument that I'm not opposed to immigrants or hate Mexicans, latinos, etc. In fact I was personally born in Ecuador and have Ecuadorian citizenship. I love to speak Spanish and enjoy Latino culture. I have frequently visited South American countries and have shared the heartbreak of those who live there and here and try to navigate the increasingly obtuse immigration laws.

Indeed, Doyle's idea must be opposed precisely because it hurts legal immigrants.

Please let me introduce you to Adrianna Sari a good friend of mine from Ecuador. She worked hard through high school and had the the academic and even financial means to come to study here in the United States. She knows English. She had plans to return to Ecuador and was willing to not even work here if the laws dictated such. No luck. After wasting hundreds of dollars on speaking to American immigration officials she remains stuck with not only no tuition but no opportunity to study here. Why? Because she followed the law.

Contrast that with any random illegal immigrant whether they are from Canada, Ecuador, or Poland. They break the law and avoid the proper course that Adrianna took to try and come to our land of opportunity. We miss them on the boarder and they graduate from a Wisconsin high school. Luck strikes! Free tuition! Why? Because she broke our law and ran the boarder.

Since when has the American opportunity become the opportunity to reward those who break the law and punish those who follow it? Why have we developed a false sense of compassion for those illegally within the country and still discriminate against those who want to follow the law?

One of the biggest differences between America and other countries people flee from is the rule of law. Ecuador has a very fragile understanding of the rule of law and their security and prosperity suffer. And yet Doyle is trying to destroy this same bedrock principle.

Doyle, stop rewarding the lawless and punishing the lawabiding. Give and help the legal not illegal for our own good and their own good.

Oxymoronic Term of the day

Ecuador Battles Chevron

This NYT article highlights how Chevron has been caught in the new political climate in Ecuador.

Texaco [now Chevron] reached a $40 million agreement with Ecuador to clean a
portion of the well sites and waste pits in its concession area,
absolving it of future liability. But that cleanup, carried out in the
1990s, was far from the bookend Texaco hoped to achieve. Instead,
villagers in Ecuador became convinced they were getting sick from the
pollution left behind. They filed suit in 1993 in the United States,
and later claimed that their grievances were not covered by Texaco’s
settlement agreement.

With little respect for the law and major populism sweeping the country, any company should be ware of doing business there.

Monday, May 18

Common Ground between dead baby and live baby?

Today Obama chatted about common ground over the issue of abortion. First, show me any common ground he has found as president. So far he has planted himself firmly on the side of death. Second, can you have common ground when the two options are dead baby or live baby? Is he proposing that he have sick or mutilated baby but not dead? And since when did the constitutional protection of life need a moderate point of view?

All smoke screen.

Picture of the Day

Not only the US that has bridges to nowhere. This one in Cuenca Ecuador. Photo courtesy of Justo Pillman.

Saturday, May 9

More talk about Mitch Daniels for Prez

This is the sort of person, Republicans should be looking at for Prez. Someone with conservative credentials who knows how to govern.


That is correct. Our old friend Mitch Daniels, who went home to Indiana to engage in some hands-on governing after years as a well-liked Republican apparatchik here in Washington, says lambasting the other guy is not enough. The voters kind of like to know where candidates propose to take them.